Today I found myself idly wondering if the people who voted in favour of Britain remaining in the EU are the same people who are in favour of mass immigration from poor non-EU countries into Britain. We now have a spike in knife crime caused mainly by members of black gangs. Our security forces have admitted there is no way they can properly monitor the 23,000 Muslims on their watch list.
Countries such as Poland and Hungary have never gone in for the mass importation of blacks and Muslims and thus have no problem with black gang crime or Muslim terrorism. Do British immigration enthusiasts ever stop for a moment and consider that it was policies they favoured that gave us these problems? Are they ever tempted to admit they got it wrong?
On the face of it there is no real reason why a British person in favour of close economic and legal ties with other European countries should also be in favour of unselective mass immigration from the Third World yet to my mind supporters of one are often supporters of the other. Why would that be? What is the thread that binds two ostensibly unconnected beliefs together? Or am I wrong and there is no overlap between the two groups?
After thinking about it I suppose the link is globalism. But wasn’t there a time when ‘good whites’ hated globalism? Didn’t they say that big western companies were exploiting the inhabitants of the Third World by setting up factories there which paid peanuts for wages? So why has globalism suddenly become a good thing? What changed?
I just can’t keep up. Who is Oceania at war with now?