Immigration’s economic benefits?


I have just read a very clever argument by Greg Cochran at West Hunter questioning the economic benefits of mass immigration that we are always hearing about. This was the argument:

Imagine if America took in 10 million Canadian immigrants. Canadians, of course, speak English, are educated to the same level as Americans, worship the same god or none, have the same IQ scores and their culture is pretty much the same as that of Americans. The question is, would this make Americans better off?

As far as I can see they would be neither richer nor poorer. GDP would rise a little because the population has grown a little but the more important GDP per capita would stay the same.

Now, imagine if America took in 10 million immigrants, not from Canada, but from Somalia, where the people often don’t speak English, are poorly educated, worship different gods, have low IQ scores and have a culture very different to that of Americans. Now the question is the same as before: Would America become any richer? In the best case scenario the Somalis prove as productive as the Canadians but they almost certainly would not be more so. It’s much more likely that they and their families would need more social assistance, social housing, English classes plus their crime rate would almost certainly be higher than that of Canadians.

If all the above is true, why do economists constantly tell us that immigration from poor countries is a huge boon to modern western economies? As far as I can tell that is a downright lie.

I suppose one argument could be that poor immigrants do the jobs rich westerners won’t do. Yet I think westerners would do those jobs if they were offered more money. If their were no Third World immigrants ready to do jobs for a pittance, employers would be forced to offer a wage high enough to entice unemployed westerners off the dole. This would mean fewer people being a drag on society, less inequality because lower-paid jobs would pay better and society would be less ethnically fractured.

So either I am missing something or economists are lying through their teeth. I can’t decide which is more likely.


5 thoughts on “Immigration’s economic benefits?”

    1. Hi, I watched the Jordan Peterson video and enjoyed it. However, it didn’t tell me anything I didn’t already know. I am not someone you need to convince that intelligence exists, that it’s important and that IQ tests measure it fairly accurately. This video didn’t relate to the subject of my post, which was Greg Cochran’s specific argument that if immigration from high IQ countries doesn’t raise GDP per capita, why should immigration from low IQ countries?

      1. Fair enough.

        I thought it proved his point, that importing <85 IQs into societies with NO jobs for <85's pretty much guarantees GDP Will not rise?

        Didn't mean to waste your time, sorry.

      2. You didn’t waste my time. I enjoyed it. But Greg Cochran’s blog post, and mine, was about why economists continue to claim that low IQ immigrants are good for wealthy western economies. That intelligence is a real thing that IQ tests measure pretty accurately, that low IQ populations are bad for modern economies and that darker-skinned immigrants tend to be low-IQ was not at issue. Apart from that Jordan Peterson didn’t say a word about immigrants.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s